You gotta hand it to Dick Clark. It took a lot of courage to come back to national television barely a year after suffering a major stroke that has severely impeded his speech.
But my admiration in watching him last night was mixed with more than a little discomfort at the questionable taste involved in the whole thing. Clark slurred his way through much of the telecast, managed to get two seconds off in the famous countdown to midnight, and then made slurping sounds into his mic as he kissed his wife.
Leave it to ABC to actually make me want to see Ryan Seacrest on screen. The "American Idol" host is expected to take over "New Year's Rockin' Eve" from the 76-year-old, although exactly when remains in question.
But after last night, let's hope that it will be next year.
[Watch video – 2:01, WMV format, high bandwidth]
[Watch video – 2:01, WMV format, low bandwidth]
I too was a bit disturbed by ABC's use of Dick Clark last night. I guess he wanted to do it and it probably was very important to him. But is certainly seemed exploitative and sad. I would hope that I would have the dignity to just walk away if in a similar situation someday. However, I don't have Dick Clark's ego, nor anything close to his career, so I cannot relate.
Posted by: Gus | January 01, 2006 at 08:02 PM
I would agree. "Questionable taste" would be making jokes about Dick Clark's condition. What ABC did should be well into the realm of "appalling".
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | January 01, 2006 at 08:18 PM
Or...
It could be a positive message that says people who are less than movie star perfect still have a place in this world; even on TV.
Posted by: Michelle | January 01, 2006 at 08:48 PM
I didn't watch the whole thing last night, but I was happy that Dick Clark was back. If he wanted to do it and was able to do it, then why not?
Posted by: ThatGayConservative | January 02, 2006 at 04:18 AM
I felt the same way when I saw Kirk Douglas on screen, afterhis stroke. But it was my problem, not his. He was only continuing to do what he's done all his life, act.
Also, stroke patients have impaired speach (aphasia) not always impaired thinking.
Posted by: hank | January 02, 2006 at 11:28 AM
Overall, I was stunned when I first heard him speak. I do think there comes a time, to go out on top and just know that you can't handle the whole shebang. He could have done the countdown and the last 5 mins or so - and everyone would have thought he was brave and courageous as he was. But to try to anchor the whole thing, saddened the whole country as to his condition. I know I sort of welled up at first - and that is not how you want to remember an event.
Posted by: Pete | January 02, 2006 at 12:01 PM
I totally agree.
Posted by: Boogie | January 02, 2006 at 12:45 PM
Although Dick was disturbing to watch, I understand his need to show up "one last time" before handing the reigns over. So we suffered with him for a few hours, he's given us so much for so many years.
I also didn't want the New Year to pass without thanking you for a year of fabulousity. I always look forward to my daily fix of Malcontent. !
All the best in 2006.
KJ
Posted by: KJ | January 02, 2006 at 01:46 PM
my favorite part was how it pops out of the depressing clark moment into ABC Voiceover Guy yelling "An up next a rockin performance by Hillary Duff." Oh the humanity!
Posted by: Pop Muse | January 02, 2006 at 09:25 PM
Frankly, I found it brave and inspiring, and any discomfort I felt was my responsibility.
Why is it that we are comfortable only around perfection?
Posted by: Jack | January 03, 2006 at 09:02 PM
Then maybe Kirk Douglas should replace Dan Rather, what say?
A prerequisite of a broadcaster is being able to broadcast. If that was his swan-song, as it rightly should have been (after a very distinguished career, I would add), then they should say so.
Posted by: Malcontent | January 03, 2006 at 09:17 PM