What kind of asshole could figure out a way to put terrorists and gays into the same category? Why, Antonin Scalia, of course! [h/t Queerty]
[UPDATE: Towleroad has more on Scalia and an obscene suggestion he made to a photographer that we're inclined to consider ourselves.]
Oh, and Polish President Lech Kaczynski too.
Australia moves to block gay civil unions.
PAYOR wants to "leave no straight person behind."
Did the Massachusetts high court just "un-marry" me and many others? For the record, I still intend to reside in Massachusetts. Yep, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
We love Tori! On the two writers of her new VH1 show: "They're gay and fabulous," she said. "Who better to write for Tori Spelling?"
"The Evidence" features the ol' gay-boxer gambit.
Do you think he threw up a little bit in her mouth?
Sounds to me like he just answered questions. You make more of this than what the text, even as reported, allows.
Also, how could you not make a MalcoVision clip of SouthPark last night? Hybrid-driving San Francisco liberals literally smelling their own farts and creating, with George Clooney, a Perfect Storm of Smug that devastated the West!
Posted by: Essem | March 30, 2006 at 12:04 PM
Essem: The thought did cross my mind, although I try to concentrate most of our videos on gay-themed stuff. Maybe Robbie has plans?
Posted by: Malcontent | March 30, 2006 at 12:16 PM
As a New Yorker, I guess I'm still married, according to the New York Times:
Posted by: Malcontent | March 30, 2006 at 01:12 PM
Deceptive headline from 365gay. Scalia did not say that gays had no rights in the Bill of Rights; he said that there was no constitutional right to homosexual sodomy. The First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, etc. all still apply to gays.
And, it would not surprise me one bit that the current Polish President's party might have planted fake bombs and blamed it on radical gays. His party is to the mainstream Polish right what the Constitution Party or Judge Roy Moore is to your garden-variety conservative Republican.
Posted by: Patrick Rothwell | March 30, 2006 at 02:10 PM
I hate that term for anal sex. Sodomy refers to the biblical tale of Sodom and Gomorrah thus making sodomy a biblical reference. Separation of church and state anyone?
Furthermore, straight people like it up the butt too.
Posted by: LikeOMGFab | March 30, 2006 at 02:31 PM
Not to mention that sodomy, in the biblical sense, refers to any sexual act that is not specifically sanctioned by religious authorities. In other words, if it ain't Missionary between two married people, you're a sodomite.
Posted by: Aatom | March 30, 2006 at 02:37 PM
str8 people like it up the butt ?! COOL !! my dating pool has just increased exponentially !
Posted by: el polacko | March 30, 2006 at 03:11 PM
.. hey ! that means i STILL have a chance with ryan, doesn't it ?! sorry, teri .. your new man has needs that you just can't ..uhh.. fill.
Posted by: el polacko | March 30, 2006 at 03:15 PM
Dude needs to lose the skinny ties, though. You're not going to bring them back single-handedly, Ryan!
Posted by: Malcontent | March 30, 2006 at 03:21 PM
I think you misunderstand me, el polacko, sodomy does not necessarily mean anal sex. It means anything not specifically sanctioned by the Church, which is most everything, including oral sex.
We are all sodomites.
Posted by: Aatom | March 30, 2006 at 04:38 PM
I am glad there is no constitutional right not to commit sodomy
Posted by: Tommy | March 30, 2006 at 10:38 PM
oh i know that "sodomy" is anything other than penile/vaginal sex (in marriage, of course), aatom. i was just goofing on likeOMGfab's assertion that "str8 people like it up the butt too" which i now feel compelled to admit that i already knew from experience... pass the boy butter, please.
Posted by: el polacko | April 01, 2006 at 04:20 AM
On the picture I see women and man, what Gay`s are you talking about? Nice info
Posted by: london inventory company | October 19, 2011 at 03:37 AM