The greatest hazard of political correctness is how easily it substitutes for thought in the mid-level political and corporate circles of America. Common sense would be refreshing. However, someone, somewhere always seems offended because they are smart enough to recognize code words and phrases they've been instructed to be offended by, but they haven't the gray matter to think critically about base distinctions like, you know, context.
Recently, a radio personality was fired for an unfortunate slip of the tongue. While discussing the possibility of Condoleeza Rice replacing retiring NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue, he remarked:
"She's got the patent resume of somebody that has serious skill. She loves football. She's African-American, which would kind of be a big coon. A big coon. Oh my God. I am totally, totally, totally, totally sorry for that."
He intended to say, "coup in the NFL." Coup in. Coon. Even he realized how it sounded and apologized profusely. He was still fired. To add insult to injury, he has also been dismissed from his second job at a local college as an anatomy and neuroanatomy instructor.
Ruining lives to placate the easily and irrationally offended. We're a fun people.
Thanks Robbie for posting on this topic and you are absolutely correct. Free speach is clearly under assault in this country (and the West in general) and I do sincerely hope that this poor man takes Howard Stern's advice and sues the hell out of both of his former employers. At this rate, no one will be able to speak or write except in the blandest form conceivable in order to avoid potentially career- or wealth-threatening ramifications.
Posted by: Gus | March 28, 2006 at 05:19 PM
what do you mean "instructed to be offended by"? are you saying people are not truly offended, but only react because that's they are suppose to do?
Posted by: JS | March 28, 2006 at 05:53 PM
JS - That's what I'm saying, more or less. There are times, like this story, where what the person does isn't objectively offensive. He blurred two words together on accident and apologized immediately.
Yet, he was still fired, because it sounded like a racial slur. No one's really offended by what he did. But, he was still fired from two jobs, because some people have it drilled into their heads that words, no matter what their context, cannot be said in public without consequence for the offense.
How else to explain what's happened here?
Posted by: Robbie | March 28, 2006 at 05:58 PM
You are right, of course. A simple slip of the tongue that one apologizes for immediatly should not, in any circumstance, be a terminatable offense. It's not like he (as Howard would have) said it over and over again (remember the whole "don't say the word 'pussy' under ANY circumstances" thing that made it to his book/movie?)
My only question is, why didn't he use the "dump" button? All radio stations that broadcast on the public airwaves have them.
Posted by: Mikell | March 28, 2006 at 06:08 PM
My guess is that he was thinking of the words "coup" and "boon," both of which would describe Condi Rice as NFL commissioner, and he transposed his syllables.
It's called a Spoonerism, and it happens to most of us on a regular basis. The man's mistake was in acknowledging his error. He should have glossed right over it and fought like hell.
It was embarrassing that the NAACP joined right in to pat the GM on the back for firing the guy. Had his politics been more "correct," I'm sure they wouldn't have batted an eyelash.
Then again, I'm sure "Hymietown" was just a Spoonerism too, which might explain why the NAACP sat that whole thing out.
Posted by: Malcontent | March 28, 2006 at 06:16 PM
The NAACP got in on this?
I didn't see that in my intial reading. Probably best that I didn't. That would've been a far longer, angrier post.
White liberals running around with Uncle Tom, Sambo, black-face, house nigger, etc.
And this is what the NAACP is speaking up about?
*growls ominously*
Posted by: Robbie | March 28, 2006 at 06:27 PM
So when you guys hear the words "faggot" or "homo", you're reaction to those words does not stem from a true sense of being offended, but rather an "instructed" sense?
Posted by: JS | March 28, 2006 at 06:42 PM
I can't speak for anyone else here, but I'm not automatically offended by faggot or homo. It always depends on the context.
Posted by: Robbie | March 28, 2006 at 06:44 PM
Context is the one missing piece in all of this.
The fact that he immediately recognized what came out, and apologized for it, makes me think the phrase was inadvertent and unintended. Also given that he was offering praise, I find it unlikely that he was mentally think of her with the racial slur.
I think an apology for the slip was in order, which he immediately offered, but firing is way over the top. I have to wonder how somebody gets fired for an obvious slip of the tongue, but Ward Churchill gets to keep his job for intentional offense.
Posted by: just me | March 28, 2006 at 07:01 PM
Robbie: On Howard Stern, the guy said that the NAACP called to complain, and the GM told them that they had already fired him. So they didn't even have to ask the idiot to jump.
Posted by: Malcontent | March 28, 2006 at 07:02 PM
Gus,
Not sure that free speech is under assault. If it was, no one could talk about this guy being fired. For the record: I do think his bosses over-reacted and hopefully he will get another gig. As for blaming this on the "pc" culture, I'm not sure.
peace
Posted by: James | March 28, 2006 at 11:12 PM
If you don't think this was a slip of the tongue, the dude was PC enough to say African American, not black. Does this sound like someone who would use the word Coon? Just an observation.
Posted by: Zack in ATX | March 29, 2006 at 01:04 AM
Sheesh, no one was mad because the guy made an inadvertent racial slur; the NAACP was upset because someone called a person who they deem a "house nigger", "dummy", "puppet", "Oreo", "Sambo", and "Uncle Tom" to be in any way competent.
You can call a black person anything you want as long as a) they're a conservative and b) it's derogatory. Just like how you can call a gay person anything you want, including "filthy", as long as you're a) a Democrat and b) black.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | March 29, 2006 at 01:38 AM
NDT,
I think you are making it all way too simple brother.
peace
Posted by: James | March 29, 2006 at 10:14 AM